Monday, December 5, 2016

Dogspeak

I hated waking up early to go to school.  My mother worked most mornings, so I had to ride the bus, which wasn’t terrible, except that I lived in the unfortunate geographical position that required me to wake up even earlier, for my bus stop was the first of the day.  After eating a sugary breakfast the older me doesn’t understand was both possible and so frequent, I hoisted my backpack over my shoulders and checked the time on the microwave clock, which often reminded me of my tardiness.  Before heading out the door and sprinting down the street, I would pet the family dog.

She usually lay curled on top of the couch in a position more feline than canine.  Sometimes I would tell her how lucky she is to sleep all day.  To remain in good standing, her only requirement was that she not run away, get into the trash can, or shit on the carpet too often.  In return, we would shelter her, feed her, and bestow considerate attention upon her.  As a child, I envied the family dog. 

She lived in an ideal state of laziness and gluttony without the impending guilt.  Nobody told her when to wake up, and nobody expected her to do the dishes.  The possibilities of her brain and body are extremely limited compared to ours.  Her world was reduced to simple desires, so excitement came easy.  The master’s routine homecoming, a soft patch of grass to pee on, a dropped morsel of food snatched up from the floor, an opportunity to sniff foreign odors around the block:  that’s all it takes for them to be thrilled.  The human equivalent of a dog’s euphoria, I assume, is usually the result of an extraordinary orgasm, a snort of cocaine, or the virginal sky-dive.

At a glance, this relationship seems parasitic, but there’s much to learn from a dog.  I am now living with eight dogs, a rare opportunity that enables me to scrutinize a dog’s effect on a person’s home life.  My aunt owns five of the dogs, fosters two more, and my brother has a cocker spaniel named Duncan.  Since I began collecting unemployment, the weather hasn’t been so great, so I’ve been stuck inside the house for several days in a row.  In the past week, my life has been very dog-like. 

When I am alone, I will talk to the dogs in a joking fashion with a voice I do not use with humans.  I should feel weird to admit this, but I think everyone has a baby-voice they use only to communicate with dogs.  Dogs have the uncanny ability to crumble our social inhibitions, so, naturally, this baby-voice is used freely when our guard is down.  But where does this voice come from?  A dog-voice can vary from person to person, but I usually find them all to be squeaky and grammatically incorrect.  My brother has invented a voice, and entire persona, for his cocker spaniel Duncan, and I have taken part.
 
The mental construct that is Duncan’s persona is that of a sarcastic, foul-mouthed comedian with a sibilant slur.  The character often pluralizes non-count nouns that traditionally do not end in S.  This made-up speech is replete with improper pronouns and a lack of subject-verb agreements, such as:  Them other dogs is annoying.  When barking is imminent, there’s an unexpected amount of cursing, especially when other dogs are near. 

People without dogs talk to themselves, but people with dogs talk to their dogs.  At a glance, both actions are the same and rarely do they signify sanity, yet talking to a dog is much more accepted as normal-ish behavior.  The personification of the dog is an attempt to give voice to his impenetrable thoughts.  When you humanize a dog’s actions, you can’t help but be absurd.  Most pet-owners, I suspect, are trying to substantiate the dog’s role in the family and create an illusion of a mutual understanding through spoken word.  Undoubtedly, some dogs can learn vocabulary words, perform tricks, and identify objects.  A dog’s role at home can range anywhere from a pretty decoration that moves, a science experiment, a quiet companion, or a therapist.

We buy dogs because we are bored, and because plants often don’t give us enough life in our living rooms.  A dog infuses a space with vitality.  While some dogs linger in the background, others are major characters.  A dog and its owner, when together, can fuse into the same character.  In some ways, the persona——this dog voice——is his master’s alter ego.  When the owner is alone, the dog voice is mostly used to narrate benign actions, belt out songs to a non-judgmental audience, and to allow your aggression to exit safely from your mind. 

During a social situation, the dog voice takes on revealing complexities.  I’ve noticed it’s used primarily to reaffirm facts and opinions.  I’ve visited friends and family members with excited dogs running in circles in celebration of my homecoming, which wasn’t the usual trip to the grocery store.  The owners would then speak to me through the dog using the dog-voice:  You’re home!  You’re home!  We missed you, didn’t we?

I visited a friend from my hometown who recently bought a house and a new dog.  As I meandered through the rooms, the dog followed, sniffing me all the way.  The pet-owner would then introduce each room with the dog-voice:  This is our dining room.  This is the living room, and the couch, where we’re not allowed.  The dog was the ambassador, translator, master of his domain, so naturally I had to go through him. 

I’ve even conducted entire conversations through dogs with aloof relatives I visited out of curiosity and a pulling obligation to end the visitation drought.  Upon entering their unfamiliar home and making the necessary greetings with my family members, I then stoop down to pet the dogs and inquire their names.  Despite our lack of camaraderie, the normal voice disappears and the dialogue resumes in the dog-voice:  He says, My name is So-and-so, and I’m four years old.

The usage of He says or She says is very telling.  Seemingly, only the master can understand what the dog is thinking.  But what this farce truly reveals is our discomfort with one another.  Our communication is diluted through the dog who is busy sniffing my recent history.  It’s easy to hide behind a dog’s unconditional affection, but it’s more difficult to look a person in the eyes and tell them where you’ve been.  You can impose your own thoughts onto a dog, but you can only wonder about the inner machinations of another person’s mind. Whether we’re talking to a dog or through a dog, we’re talking about ourselves:  what we know to be true and those thoughts we’re afraid to call our own.

Wednesday, November 23, 2016

Time to Fill

This new blog is a treatment on how to spend time.  All of us has habits that form into routines that become a structure that orients the direction of our lives.  The unfortunate part of this equation is that we are a forward-looking species with a penchant for instant gratification.  We must remind ourselves to remain in the present, especially when we’re just okay, or even bored.  In a greater sense, this blog is an analysis of the evasion of boredom and how we spend our time.

There’s a general question we ask of each other, and that’s:  What do you do?  From my experience, this question is answered in the form of occupation such as, I’m a nurse, or I’m a manager.  The shorter the answer, the more assured the person is of his or her occupation.  I have never been extremely comfortable with my position, so when I’m asked this question, I say:  I just wait tables… for now.  And then I may embark on a lengthy explanation of, first, what this job enables me to do and, secondly, what I would rather be doing.

The focus of the occupation question is borne from societal status and the relentless pressure to rise above your ranks.  We are taught this from an early age when our kindergarten teachers ask us what we want to be when we grow up.  I remember wanting to be a professional basketball player.  I doubt any of my classmates wanted to be waiters, mechanics, infantrymen, or drug addicts, but that’s where many of us are right now.  It’s easier to feed children dreams rather than prepare them for the possibility of failure.  But, then again, failure may not be such a bad thing if it makes you realize what you really want.

In our culture, doctors mean more than waiters.  Once you become a doctor or a baseball player or an accountant with a big firm, I imagine people stop asking you what you’re going to do with your life.  To the people asking the questions, you’ve made it.  But what about the rest of us in the working class?  The assumption is we want to ascend, but what if we want to take things in a different direction?  I'm not saying I'm perfectly content with performing manual labor for the rest of my life.  Even if this happens to be the case, there are worse fates to have.  All I want to suggest is that we use a different scale by which to measure success.

My goal is to become an English professor.  I imagine myself satisfied with pontificating in an academic environment.  The schedule seems ideal with weekends and summers off.  And I'm sure the money can accommodate a comfortable lifestyle.  But I have side missions, too.  I want to visit every country in Europe and every national park in the US and Canada.  I want to be a great three-point shooter, even if it means making a lot of shots by myself at the gym.  I want to become a better cook even if I never get paid to do it in a restaurant.  I want to write a screenplay, and I want to become completely fluent in French, and I want to read serious fiction that alters my perspective, feeds my curiosity, and fulfills my desire to discuss the intangible issues.  If I accomplish all of this while waiting tables, should I consider my life a failure because I haven't obtained my dream job?

This is an exploration of the alternative courses a life can take.  Here is my situation:  Around the first of November, I finished an eight month season waiting tables at Bryce Canyon National Park, where I saved up a bit of money.  I’m currently unemployed and living at my aunt’s house in the suburbs of San Antonio, Texas.  She is generous in that she is not charging me for food, utilities, or rent in exchange for performing chores, doing handiwork, and cooking dinner.  Since I’m a seasonal employee, I qualify for unemployment benefits for four months.  I’m not required to search for a job, but I must stay within the country and file a weekly claim that proves my ability to go back to work.  With those requirements met, I get $464 per week funneled into my bank account.

I imagine the most reasonable reactions to this:  I’m mooching off family. I’m being lazy and selfish.  I’m going to get bored. A functional member of society such as myself should be working.  Let me start by stating that the company I work for is paying my unemployment, and that many of my coworkers choose this option as well.  When you work eight months seasonally, you really cram in about ten months of work due to the extreme demand we must meet.  It is not always a comfortable existence.  I had no kitchen.  My diet was dictated by others, and the food was hit-or-miss.  Cell service is minimal.  Every movie I watched on Netflix buffered at least five times before I could finish it.  I know that’s definitely a first-world problem and barely worth mentioning due to its embarrassing nature, but the truth is we seek comfort in nearly every decision we make. 

This is exactly why I decided to not work and get paid for doing absolutely nothing.  I have a few months to spend my time however I choose.  I’ve already decided that I will often sleep in until noon and binge watch The Wire.  But I don’t want to waste this opportunity hopping from one pleasurable vice to the next.  I want to be productive and improve myself.  All of us probably has a list of things we never got around to doing like learning Spanish or reading Moby Dick.  This is the time to check off those kinds of goals. 

My plan is to collect unemployment for the months of December and January.  Then I will travel in Eastern Europe by train for the entire month of February until returning to work in March.  I made this decision yesterday and immediately became attached to this projected future, which forced me to realize that my life is structured around chasing unexpected dreams that weasel into my mind and ferment until I can no longer imagine an alternative future.  Since I graduated from college three years ago, I have packed the few possessions I own and dove into some foreign destination simply because I was curious as to what I would find there.


Now I am back in familiar territory:  a house with central heat and air, reliable insulation, firm ground under the foundation, a refrigerator stuffed with my favorite foods, and a private bathroom where I can brush my teeth without a man shaving in the sink next to me while another man sits in the stall behind me.  I have everything I need here, except, of course, that is never enough.